{"product_id":"quo-vadis-common-fisheries-policy-isbn-9781119576860","title":"Quo Vadis Common Fisheries Policy?","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eOffers a guide and provides an analysis of how a public European fisheries policy should be evaluated, implemented, and reformed\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eQuo Vadis Common Fisheries Policy?\u003c\/i\u003e is an essential book that provides an authoritative guide to the future challenges that face the public European fisheries policy. Written by a noted expert with 30 years’ experience in fisheries policies, the book provides the information needed to analyze how a public EU policy should be evaluated, implemented, and reformed.\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe book examines the difficulties of implementing the new policy including the application of the objectives of the 2013 policy reform. The author explores the myriad challenges that face the new policy due to global warming, pollution, and other global drivers. The book compares the new policy with other fisheries policy, particularly with the United States fisheries policy under the Magnusson-Stevens Act. The book offers an opportunity to address and discuss the challenges and obstacles that are not currently in the public domain. This important book:\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003eProvides a unique view from a noted expert and former policy insider\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eOffers a critical analysis of a public EU policy from a pro-European standpoint.\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eGives a foundational resource to aid in the debate on the future of the Common Fisheries Policy\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eIncludes topics that go beyond EU’s policy and have implications for fisheries’ management around the world\u003c\/li\u003e \u003c\/ul\u003e \u003cp\u003eWritten for administrations and stakeholders in the European and international fishing industry, \u003ci\u003eQuo Vadis Common Fisheries Policy?\u003c\/i\u003e addresses the challenges of EU’s new fisheries policy and offers a comparison of the US fisheries policy. The book helps foster much-needed debate about this topic.\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreface xiii\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgments xv\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDisclaimer xvii\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e1 The common fisheries policy: stability or change? 1\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction: fisheries, a conservative world 1\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA distributional policy 1\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy change vs. policy stability 2\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy do policies change? 4\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLegal change vs. policy change 4\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDoes the CFP change too much or too little? 6\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy rigidity vs. policy flexibility: why is the CFP so rigid? 7\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy implementation and policy change: the challenge of implementing the 2013 reform 8\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe challenges of implementation 9\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP’s legendary bad press 9\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe reformed CFP: success or failure? 10\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe notion of “policy success” in fisheries management 10\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy results: how good are they? 13\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving reporting of policy performance 18\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIf the CFP is not so bad, why advocating policy change? 22\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 23\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2 The objectives of the CFP 25\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 25\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe common fisheries policy in the Treaty 26\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries policy: a multi-objective policy 26\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe objectives in Article 39 of the Treaty 26\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther legal principles applicable to the CFP 27\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy objectives in other countries 28\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe United States 29\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAustralia 30\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNew Zealand 31\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNorway 31\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe case for full exploitation of fishery resources 32\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreventing overfishing or fully exploiting? 32\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs under-exploitation positive? 32\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs under-exploitation a realistic scenario in the CFP? 33\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe example of the US 33\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnder-exploitation in the EU? 34\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnder-exploitation vs. over-exploitation 36\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe consequences of under-exploitation 37\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects on other marine areas 37\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects on land: is livestock production better than fishing? 37\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe public debate 38\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre the fishery objectives of the new CFP too rigid? 39\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe lessons from the US system 39\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSocio-economic objectives vs. biological delivery: should the policy establish specific socio-economic targets? 40\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 41\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3 Implementing maximum sustainable yield 43\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat is maximum sustainable yield? 43\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDefining MSY 43\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY in the reformed CFP 44\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY in international law 44\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY and the Treaty 45\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs maximum economic yield a better option? 45\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn area around MSY 46\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY as biomass or as fishing mortality? 47\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 47\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eB\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e as an “aspirational objective” 49\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe interpretation by environmental NGOs 50\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle stock objectives in the marine ecosystems: can all stocks be “above B\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e” in mixed fisheries? 50\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eB\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e, an elusive parameter 51\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe US system 51\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEstimating F\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e 52\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle-stock F\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e vs. ecosystem-based F\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e 52\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProxies for data-poor fisheries 52\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlternative approaches: escapement strategies 53\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e as a target or as a limit? 53\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe notion of risk in fishery management 54\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe US case 55\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e: a point value or a range? 55\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBackground 55\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe case for fishing mortality ranges 56\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eF ranges: handle with care. Are they precautionary? 58\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe on-going experience: MSY in multiannual management plans 58\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eF ranges and the choke species problem: the Baltic precedent 58\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe consolidation of F ranges 59\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe safeguards: biomass thresholds 60\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eShould all plans reproduce that precedent? 60\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u003csub\u003emsy\u003c\/sub\u003e for all stocks: what does it mean? 61\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData-poor and secondary stocks: manage them to MSY? 61\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 61\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhich stocks to manage? 62\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre the EU-managed stocks the right ones? 63\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProblem stocks 66\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 67\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4 The challenge of mixed fisheries 71\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed fisheries in the new CFP 71\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCan MSY be achieved for all stocks in mixed fisheries? 71\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed fisheries and choke species 72\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChoke species: some experience outside the EU 72\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChoke species under the new CFP 73\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlternative management approaches for mixed fisheries 75\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultispecies approaches 75\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat potential for multispecies models? 75\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePretty good yield 76\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Fcube model 77\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMulti-stock reference points 78\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eManaging stock aggregates? 78\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow much can we sacrifice weak stocks? 79\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn ecological cap on TACs? 80\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrophic models 81\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultispecies models and trade-offs: is multispecies management compatible with relative stability? 82\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs multispecies management compatible with the objectives of the CFP? 83\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCan associated species in mixed fisheries be dissociated? 84\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe US experience in dissociating stocks 84\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow to dissociate stocks in mixed fisheries in the EU? 85\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 88\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e5 Achieving policy objectives in Mediterranean fisheries 91\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY and Mediterranean fisheries 91\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTime to catch-up 91\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe status of Mediterranean fisheries 92\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainable overfishing? 93\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic performance 94\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Mediterranean specificity 94\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal warming: a game-changer 95\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCan MSY be achieved by 2020 for all stocks in Mediterranean fisheries? 96\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe point of departure 96\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat stocks to manage in the Mediterranean? 97\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA focus on EU stocks 98\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAvoiding “cut and paste” approaches 98\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA fishery approach? 99\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStreamlining scientific advice 100\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe need for a “client” for the scientific community 100\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData poor stocks and MSY proxies 101\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRevising stock boundaries 102\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP and GFCM 103\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat instruments to use in Mediterranean fisheries? 103\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFishing effort plans 104\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTACs 104\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe multispecies approach: a better alternative for the Mediterranean? 105\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClosed areas 105\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMesh sizes 106\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe transition: a buy-out scheme for Mediterranean fisheries 107\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 108\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e6 The landing obligation 111\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP and the problem of discarding 111\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscarding in the CFP: how much? Why? 111\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 2013 policy on discards 112\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA critique of the landing obligation of 2013 113\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscards and direct human consumption 114\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat other countries do on discarding 115\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe US case 115\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNorway 116\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIceland 117\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects of a non-discard policy 117\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiological effects 117\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic effects 118\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChoke species and the “perfect storm” of 2019 120\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelative stability as a contributor to choke species 120\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuota swaps as a possible solution 121\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow efficient is the quota swap system? 121\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre quota swaps increasing to facilitate the discard ban? 122\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCan quota swaps be enhanced? 123\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe flexibility mechanisms 124\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe de minimis allowance 124\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe survival exemption 124\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe cross-reporting of catches 125\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEx-ante and ex-post quota adjustments: banking and borrowing 125\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther possible elements of flexibility 126\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTAC uplifts 126\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReducing minimum conservation reference sizes? 127\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWorking on the fringes of relative stability? 127\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther possible mechanisms 128\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementing the landing obligation in practice 129\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy-catch avoidance: mitigation 129\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eControlling the landing obligation 131\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat to do with unwanted fish? 134\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe need for monitoring 135\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs the landing obligation economically viable? 136\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 137\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e7 Beyond single-stock TACs: the other instruments of the CFP 141\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eManagement by single-stock TACs 141\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe advantages of TAC management 141\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe limits of TACs as an instrument 141\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther instruments available in the CFP 142\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffort management 142\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs effort a good management instrument? 143\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Faroese system as an example 143\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe experience of effort management in the CFP 144\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffort management and technological creep 147\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe potential for a (different) effort management in the CFP 148\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnical conservation measures 149\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe objectives of TCM 149\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe difficulty in increasing selectivity 150\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnical measures in the new CFP 151\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMesh sizes 152\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClosed areas\/seasons 152\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMinimum conservation reference sizes 155\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnical measures and the landing obligation 157\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 158\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e8 Fisheries and the environment 161\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP and environmental policy 161\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 161\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIncorporating environmental concerns into the CFP 162\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverlapping legislation 163\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe dichotomy between fisheries management and environmental protection: the case of sharks 168\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSharks: protect or manage? 168\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eShark finning 169\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome ideas on management 170\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects of fishing on the environment 171\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFishing: the evil of the seas? 171\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFishing down the food web? 173\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDoes sustainable fishing increase productivity? 173\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreserving marine biodiversity 174\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow to measure biodiversity: existing indicators 174\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProtecting biodiversity on land as a comparison 175\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarine Protected Areas: the ultimate instrument? 177\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow to evaluate the preservation of biodiversity: the notion of ecosystem services 178\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ecosystem approach 179\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ecosystem approach and the CFP 180\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEcosystem-based fisheries management 181\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA test case: managing forage fish 182\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat future for ecosystem-based management in the CFP? 183\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA provocative idea: balanced harvest 184\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs selective fishing always a good idea? 184\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe notion of “balanced harvest” 185\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs balanced harvest applicable in practice? 186\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 186\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9 Fisheries governance and the CFP 191\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evolution of governance under the CFP 191\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 191\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe balance between discipline and flexibility 192\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy flexibility: the example of the United States 193\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCan the CFP be more flexible? The notion of “level playing field” in the CFP 193\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new paradigm of the CFP: regionalization 194\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe example of the US: a regionalized fisheries policy 194\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegionalization of the CFP: the experience of discard plans 195\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of stakeholder bodies 196\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe example of the US: what can we learn from the US Regional Councils? 196\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe EU’s Advisory Councils’ structure and composition: are they equipped to do their job? 199\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA note on consensus: is this the best method? 200\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre the ACs worth the investment? 200\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of Producer Organizations 201\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental NGOs and the CFP 202\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNGOs and legitimacy: funding 203\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNGOs and their influence 204\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNGOs and Advisory Councils 205\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs cooperation between industry and NGOs possible? 206\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of science 206\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new CFP and fisheries science 206\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving scientific advice 207\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData and science 208\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStreamlining the evaluation process: stock prioritization 209\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScience and the management system 210\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic advice 213\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScience in the information age 214\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of consumers: certification systems 215\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe case of MSC 215\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe dolphin safe certification 216\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther certification systems 216\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic or private labels? 217\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat to certify in the future? 218\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGovernance in the reformed CFP: the example of multiannual plans 218\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBackground 219\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultiannual plans and the role of the institutions 219\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow has co-decision fared for the CFP? 220\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAddressing variability and uncertainty 222\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommunicating the uncertainty 224\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpatial dynamics 224\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA governance system that quickly incorporates variability 225\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow to make the CFP more adaptive to variability and uncertainty? 226\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy monitoring: from description to causality 227\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy complexity: can the CFP be simplified? 228\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs policy complexity inevitable? 228\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe complex political\/geographical\/jurisdictional context 229\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evolution of the decision-making workflow in the CFP 229\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe example of the US 230\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCan regionalization reduce complexity? 231\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCan guidelines replace regulations in the CFP? 231\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChanging the paradigm: from prescriptive to collaborative governance 232\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eResults-based management 232\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDoes the CFP have the structures for collaborative management? 232\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCreating trust 233\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 234\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e10 The CFP and international fisheries 237\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe external dimension as an essential part of the CFP 237\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 237\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe EU as the crucial actor in international fisheries governance 238\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe external dimension of the CFP and international governance 239\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarine Protected Areas: the miracle instrument? 240\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMPAs: what objectives? 241\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Aichi targets 242\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe notion of “ocean grabbing” 243\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ultimate MPA: a ban on high seas fishing? 244\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh seas fishing: economic nonsense? 245\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA ban on high seas trawling? 245\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational governance and developing countries 246\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational fisheries governance: a rich country’s agenda? 246\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCapacity building 247\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFight against poverty 247\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccess to fishing rights 248\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge-scale MPAs and developing countries 249\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal fleet capacity 250\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA problem of global governance 250\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Kobe process 250\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA key factor: the allocation of fishing rights 251\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries enforcement at global level: fighting against illegal fishing 252\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 252\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe success of the EU IUU policy 253\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA multilateral IUU policy 253\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat future for the fight against IUU fishing? 254\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe improvement of RFMOs 255\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy RFMOs are so important 255\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe necessary improvements 255\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNEAFC and the “coastal states arrangement” 259\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe changes in the traditional status quo of the oceans 259\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe increasing privatization of the world’s oceans 260\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe emergent fishing nations 260\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 261\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e11 The missing elements of the 2013 Policy reform 265\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat the 2013 CFP reform missed 265\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe issues beyond the “big four” 265\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRights-based management 265\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs rights-based management good or bad? 266\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy did TFCs fail in the 2013 reform? 267\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe experience of third countries 268\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe experience of some EU Member States 271\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRights-based management and discards 272\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs there a market of fishing rights in the EU? 272\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmall-scale fisheries: no specific policy 273\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDefining small-scale fishing: more difficult than it seems 274\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat small-scale and large-scale can provide 275\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe comparative impacts of small-scale vs. large-scale fishing 275\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat can we learn from aboriginal fishing rights? 276\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe fisheries control system 277\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe dichotomy between EU policy and national control 277\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHarmonization of sanctions? 278\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnhanced powers for EFCA? 279\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe control of the landing obligation: a test case 279\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe management system: is cost-recovery possible in the CFP? 280\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs self-control an option? 281\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFleet policy: does it still have any sense today? 282\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBackground 282\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFleet policy in the 2013 reform 282\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe US case 283\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre capacity ceilings limiting anything? 283\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs there a case for fleet policy? 284\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe EMFF: an instrument to accompany the reform? 285\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome positives . . . 285\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e. . . and some negatives 285\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe structural measures of the US as a point for reflection 286\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 287\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e12 The global context: emerging challenges 289\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe status of the world’s fishery resources 289\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Pauly\/Hilborn controversy 289\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSo, who is right and who is wrong? 291\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe case of the EU 293\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDoes fisheries management work? 294\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe “perfect protein”: can the world afford to under-exploit its fishing opportunities? 295\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHunger and poverty: fish consumption and the global demand for fish 295\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre the land-based alternatives better? Protein from livestock 295\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA question of equity: the notion of “leakage” 296\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries: a key component of future diets 297\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture: the seafood of the future? 298\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture and capture fisheries: are they compatible? 298\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs aquaculture ecologically sustainable? 299\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries and employment 302\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmployment at sea 302\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe property of the means of production: who owns the fishing rights? Does it matter? 304\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy the structure of property matters 304\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat possible effects on management? 305\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClimate change and fisheries management 305\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal warming and the oceans 306\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal warming and food production 307\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects of climate change on fisheries and aquaculture 308\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow to address the problem: the case of Alaska 309\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarine pollution: the example of micro-plastics and marine resources 310\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDistribution and incorporation to the food chain 310\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects of micro-plastics on consumers 311\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat to do? 311\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries in the information age 312\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe influence of the information society on policy making 312\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe bad image of industrial fishing 313\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 314\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e13 Adapting the CFP to emerging challenges 317\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdapting the CFP beyond reform 317\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmerging challenges and the value of long-term strategic thinking 317\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdapting the CFP to climate change 318\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evidence of climate change in EU fisheries 318\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA case study: Atlantic cod 320\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe consequences of climate change in the CFP 320\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe US example 321\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA strategic plan to adapt the CFP to climate change 321\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMore food from the sea 323\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeafood vs. land-based food 324\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs the EU producing enough food from the oceans? 324\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome background 324\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre there untapped fish resources? 326\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExploiting the lower trophic levels 327\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving quota consumption 327\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChanging the policy paradigm: a policy based on exploiting the surplus of the marine ecosystem, not individual stocks 327\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDeveloping new aquaculture practice 328\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe integration of fisheries policy into a wider policy context 328\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe wider notion of fisheries management 328\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe relationship between fisheries and other economic sectors 329\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe challenge of science vs. social influence 329\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBridging the chasm: a “new deal” between the fishing industry and environmental NGOs? 330\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecreational fisheries in Europe 331\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe US case 332\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 333\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e14 Some ideas for the next CFP reform 335\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA vision of the future CFP 335\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 2009 vision: is it still valid today? 335\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNew elements of a vision of the future CFP 335\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNew policy objectives 336\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn improved governance system 337\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA more flexible, adaptive CFP 337\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA new legislative culture: concentrating on political objectives, not on micro-management 338\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA new decision support framework 339\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe future of regionalization 339\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe notion of co-creation and the “irrational” part of decision-making 340\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCreating breathing space for the ACs 340\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA new structure for an enhanced role for the Advisory Councils 341\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelative stability: why it should evolve 342\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy question the CFP’s cornerstone? 342\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre individual annual quotas under relative stability biologically and economically rational? 343\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn enhanced market of fishing rights among Member States 344\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA European market of fishing rights? The case of milk quotas 345\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEvolution through adjustment 347\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA revamping of relative stability: from single-stock shares to combined shares 350\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Mediterranean: a new management paradigm 351\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eShould the CFP manage recreational fishing? 351\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat future for the fishery structural funds? 352\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn instrument to promote policy change, not to maintain the status quo 353\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat structural funds for the future CFP? 353\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroducing market mechanisms in the CFP? 356\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn alternative approach: RBM partial and optional 357\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA specific policy for small-scale fishing? 357\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA reformulated discard policy 358\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNew objectives 358\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccepting (while discouraging) over-quota landings 359\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDo we need to change the basic regulation? 359\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy changes not requiring legislative change 359\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy changes requiring clarification or interpretation 360\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy changes requiring legislative change 360\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 360\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlossary 363\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbbreviations 365\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndex 367\u003c\/p\u003e  \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eERNESTO PENAS LADO,\u003c\/b\u003e is retired. He worked for nearly 30 years at the Directorate for Maritime Policy and Fisheries of the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium.   \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eOffers a guide and provides an analysis of how a public European fisheries policy should be evaluated, implemented, and reformed\u003c\/b\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eQuo Vadis Common Fisheries Policy?\u003c\/i\u003e is an essential book that provides an authoritative guide to the future challenges that face the public European fisheries policy. Written by a noted expert with 30 years' experience in fisheries policies, the book provides the information needed to analyze how a public EU policy should be evaluated, implemented, and reformed. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe book examines the difficulties of implementing the new policy including the application of the objectives of the 2013 policy reform. The author explores the myriad challenges that face the new policy due to global warming, pollution, and other global drivers. The book compares the new policy with other fisheries policy, particularly with the United States fisheries policy under the Magnusson-Stevens Act. The book offers an opportunity to address and discuss the challenges and obstacles that are not currently in the public domain. This important book: \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003eProvides a unique view from a noted expert and former policy insider\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eOffers a critical analysis of a public EU policy from a pro-European standpoint\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eGives a foundational resource to aid in the debate on the future of the Common Fisheries Policy\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eIncludes topics that go beyond EU's policy and have implications for fisheries' management around the world\u003c\/li\u003e \u003c\/ul\u003e \u003cp\u003eWritten for administrations and stakeholders in the European and international fishing industry, \u003ci\u003eQuo Vadis Common Fisheries Policy?\u003c\/i\u003e addresses the challenges of EU's new fisheries policy and offers a comparison of the US fisheries policy. The book helps foster much-needed debate about this topic.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Wiley-Blackwell","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47989902246117,"sku":"NP9781119576860","price":233.95,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1842\/7735\/files\/9781119576860.jpg?v=1761785851","url":"https:\/\/k12savings.com\/products\/quo-vadis-common-fisheries-policy-isbn-9781119576860","provider":"K12savings","version":"1.0","type":"link"}