{"product_id":"evil-geniuses-isbn-9781984801357","title":"Evil Geniuses","description":"\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eNEW YORK TIMES \u003c\/i\u003eBESTSELLER • When did America give up on fairness? The author of \u003ci\u003eFantasyland\u003c\/i\u003e tells the epic history of how America decided that big business gets whatever it wants, only the rich get richer, and nothing should ever change—and charts a way back to the future.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003e“Essential, absorbing . . . a graceful, authoritative guide . . . a radicalized moderate’s moderate case for radical change.”—\u003ci\u003eThe New York Times Book Review\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDuring the twentieth century, America managed to make its economic and social systems both more and more fair and more and more prosperous. A huge, secure, and contented middle class emerged. All boats rose together. But then the New Deal gave way to the Raw Deal. Beginning in the early 1970s, by means of a long war conceived of and executed by a confederacy of big business CEOs, the superrich, and right-wing zealots, the rules and norms that made the American middle class possible were undermined and dismantled. The clock was turned back on a century of economic progress, making greed good, workers powerless, and the market all-powerful while weaponizing nostalgia, lifting up an oligarchy that served only its own interests, and leaving the huge majority of Americans with dwindling economic prospects and hope.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhy and how did America take such a wrong turn? In this deeply researched and brilliantly woven cultural, economic, and political chronicle, Kurt Andersen offers a fresh, provocative, and eye-opening history of America’s undoing, naming names, showing receipts, and unsparingly assigning blame—to the radical right in economics and the law, the high priests of high finance, a complacent and complicit Establishment, and liberal “useful idiots,” among whom he includes himself.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOnly a writer with Andersen’s crackling energy, deep insight, and ability to connect disparate dots and see complex systems with clarity could make such a book both intellectually formidable and vastly entertaining. And only a writer of Andersen’s vision could reckon with our current high-stakes inflection point, and show the way out of this man-made disaster.“This is the one book everyone must read as we figure out how to rebuild our country. With lucid writing and head-snapping insights, Kurt Andersen explores how a confederacy of the right and big business, with unabashed greed, deliberately reengineered our economy. To fix that will require understanding the roots of the problem. A triumph.”\u003cb\u003e—Walter Isaacson, author of \u003ci\u003eThe Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“Nostalgia is the antithesis of history. Andersen brilliantly exposes how nostalgia—the strategic oversimplification of our past—has erased complexity and friction from our country’s narrative to serve a single goal: to preserve the status quo for the benefit of those in power. \u003ci\u003eEvil Geniuses\u003c\/i\u003e documents how history and nostalgia are engaged in hand-to-hand combat that may determine our future.”\u003cb\u003e—Ken Burns, director of \u003ci\u003eThe Civil War\u003c\/i\u003e and \u003ci\u003eThe Roosevelts: An Intimate History\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“How did the United States turn from its longstanding egalitarian ideals to its present course of socially and morally catastrophic inequality? Kurt Andersen interrogates the past half century with characteristic intellectual ambition and literary bravado to find out. At once cultural history, memoir, and riff, \u003ci\u003eEvil Geniuses\u003c\/i\u003e explains how our country found its way into this predicament, and how we might yet get out of it.”\u003cb\u003e—Jacob Weisberg, author of \u003ci\u003eThe Bush Tragedy\u003c\/i\u003e and \u003ci\u003eRonald Reagan\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“\u003ci\u003eEvil Geniuses\u003c\/i\u003e is a vivid catalog of American sociopolitical history—a dedicated deep dive into this country’s paradoxical legacy of innovation and ego, with Andersen as its clear-eyed, masterful archivist.”\u003cb\u003e—Rebecca Carroll, WNYC cultural critic and host of the podcast \u003ci\u003eCome Through\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“Back when the idea of President Reagan still seemed a stretch and President Trump was barely a joke, some serious, smart, committed people with vast appetites and little shame—right-wing intellectuals and billionaires, CEOs and Washington hustlers—launched a long war to create a paradigm shift and rewrite our social contract to their benefit. Andersen’s dazzling, mind-bending, must-read chronicle of that fifty-year crusade explains how it happened, why it succeeded, and, unsettlingly, what that victory means: America is now theirs.”\u003cb\u003e—John Heilemann, co-founder and executive editor, The Recount\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“Wow. \u003ci\u003eEvil Geniuse\u003c\/i\u003es is engaging, enraging, enthralling, appalling; a true tour de force. And most of all, it’s the truth—about how these rapacious bastards have picked this country’s bones for the last fifty years, and what the rest of us need to do to turn the tables. Exactly the book we need right now.”\u003cb\u003e—Michael Tomasky, \u003ci\u003eDaily Beast\u003c\/i\u003e columnist and author of \u003ci\u003eIf We Can Keep It\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eKurt Andersen\u003c\/b\u003e is the bestselling author of \u003ci\u003eEvil Geniuses\u003c\/i\u003e, \u003ci\u003eFantasyland\u003c\/i\u003e and the novels \u003ci\u003eTrue Believers, Heyday \u003c\/i\u003eand\u003ci\u003eTurn of the Century, \u003c\/i\u003eamong other books. He contributes to \u003ci\u003eThe New York Times\u003c\/i\u003e and was host and co-creator of \u003ci\u003eStudio 360,\u003c\/i\u003e the Peabody Award–winning public radio show and podcast. He also writes for television, film, and the stage. Andersen co-founded \u003ci\u003eSpy\u003c\/i\u003e magazine, served as editor in chief of \u003ci\u003eNew York,\u003c\/i\u003e and was a cultural columnist and design critic for \u003ci\u003eTime, New York\u003c\/i\u003e and \u003ci\u003eThe New Yorker\u003c\/i\u003e. He graduated from Harvard College and lives in Brooklyn.As I was working on \u003ci\u003eFantasyland, \u003c\/i\u003ereading and thinking about American history, I noticed more connections between the two phenomena—between our simultaneous switch in the 1970s and ’80s to a grisly old-fashioned political economy \u003ci\u003eand \u003c\/i\u003eto a strenuously, continuously familiar culture. Which led me to spend a couple of years reading and thinking more deeply about both.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e A \u003ci\u003elot \u003c\/i\u003emore deeply about the economics and politics. That’s what I’d mainly studied in college, but since then I’d mostly just read the news, skimmed along day to day and month to month like anybody whose job never required knowing a lot about deregulation, antitrust, tax codes, pensions, the healthcare industry, the legal fraternity, constitutional law, organized labor, executive compensation, lobbying, billionaires’ networks, the right wing, the dynamics of economic growth, stock buybacks, the financial industry and all its innovations—so many subjects of which I was mostly ignorant.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e My immersion was revelatory. Reading hundreds of books and scholarly papers and articles and having conversations with experts made me more or less fluent in those subjects and, more, taught me many small things and one important big thing: what happened around 1980 and afterward was larger and uglier and more multifaceted than I’d known. \u003ci\u003eInequality \u003c\/i\u003eis the buzzword, mainly because that’s so simple and quantifiable: in forty years, the share of wealth owned by our richest 1 percent has doubled, the collective net worth of the bottom half has dropped almost to zero, the median weekly pay for a full-time worker has increased by just 0.1 percent a year, \u003ci\u003eonly \u003c\/i\u003ethe incomes of the top 10 percent have grown in sync with the economy, and so on. Americans’ boats stopped rising together; most of the boats stopped rising at all. But along with economic \u003ci\u003einequality \u003c\/i\u003ereverting to the levels of a century ago and earlier, so has economic \u003ci\u003einsecurity, \u003c\/i\u003eas well as the corrupting political power of big business and the rich, \u003ci\u003eoligarchy, \u003c\/i\u003ewhile economic \u003ci\u003eimmobility \u003c\/i\u003eis almost certainly worse than it’s ever been.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Before I started my research, I’d understood the changes in the 1970s and ’80s hadn’t all just \u003ci\u003e. . . happened, \u003c\/i\u003espontaneously. But I didn’t know how long and concerted and strategic the project by the political right and the rich and big business had been. One of my subjects in \u003ci\u003eFantasyland   \u003c\/i\u003eis how conspiracy-theorizing became an American bad habit, a way our chronic mixing of fiction and reality got the best of us. Of course there are secretive cabals of powerful people who work to make big bad things happen, actual conspiracies, but the proliferation of conspiracy \u003ci\u003etheories \u003c\/i\u003esince the 1960s, so many so preposterous, had the unfortunate effect of making reasonable people ignore real plots in plain sight. Likewise, the good reflex to search for and focus on the complexities and nuances of any story, on grays rather than simple whites and blacks, can tend to blind us to some plain dark truths.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e I still insist on a preponderance of evidence before I draw conclusions. I still resist reducing messy political and economic reality to catch-phrases like “vast right-wing conspiracy” and “the system is rigged,” but I discovered that in this case the blunt shorthand is essentially correct. It looks more like arson than a purely accidental fire, more like poisoning than a completely natural illness, more like a cheating of the many by  the few. After all, as the god of the economic right himself, Adam Smith, wrote in capitalism’s 1776 bible, \u003ci\u003eThe Wealth of Nations: \u003c\/i\u003e“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.”\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eEvil Geniuses \u003c\/i\u003eis the book I wish had existed a dozen years ago to help clarify and organize and deepen and focus my thinking and understanding and anger and blame. Like most people over the past decade, I’d noticed this fact here or that infographic there about inequality or insecurity or malign corporate power, but quickly moved on, flittered off to the next headline. But then I decided to go deep into the weeds in order to understand, then come out of the weeds to explain what I’d learned as clearly as I could. I wanted to distill and gather and connect the important facts and explanations in one compact package, to make a coherent picture out of all the puzzle pieces. There are lots of facts and figures in here, but not much jargon at all. By chronicling CEOs and billionaires and intellectu- als and zealots and operators planning and strategizing for years, together and apart, networking and plotting, even memorializing some plots in memos—so many jaw-dropping \u003ci\u003ememos—\u003c\/i\u003eI’ve tried to tell a compelling story as well as make a persuasive argument about what’s become of us.\u003cbr\u003e  \u003cbr\u003e So how did big business and the very rich and their political allies and enablers manage to convince enough Americans in the 1970s and ’80s that the comfortable economic rules and expectations we’d had in place for half of the twentieth century were obsolete and should be replaced by an older set of assumptions and protocols?\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Most people at the time didn’t realize just how immense and pervasive the changes were and certainly not where they’d lead. Reagan’s election and landslide reelection were plainly big deals, \u003ci\u003esome \u003c\/i\u003esort of national mandate, but at the time the 1980s seemed more like a post-1960s rever- sion to the historically typical, not really its own moment of wrenching transformation. Whereas during the 1960s, everyone was aware we were experiencing a great turning point in culture and politics, with almost everything changing in obvious ways—like how in the ’30s people were aware in real time that the Depression and New Deal were transformative, the beginning of a new America. The specific policy changes in the 1980s were profound in the aggregate, but beyond the nostalgic Reaganite Morning in America and freer-free-markets messaging, most of the changes were complicated and esoteric and seemed small, so they had a stealth quality. It didn’t feel quite like a paradigm shift because it was mainly carried out by means of a thousand wonky adjustments to government rules and laws, and obscure financial inventions, and big companies one by one changing how they operated and getting away with it—all of it with impacts that emerged gradually, over decades. Social Security and Medicare benefits were not cut, the EPA wasn’t abolished, labor unions weren’t banned. As it turned out, the 1980s were the ’30s but in reverse: instead of a fast-acting New Deal, a time-release Raw Deal. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBut the reengineering was helped along because the masterminds of the economic right brilliantly used the madly proliferating nostalgia. By dressing up their mean new rich-get-richer system in old-time patriotic drag. By portraying low taxes on the rich and unregulated business and weak unions and a weak federal government as the only ways back to some kind of rugged, frontiersy, stronger, \u003ci\u003ebetter \u003c\/i\u003eAmerica. And by choosing as their front man a winsome 1950s actor in a cowboy hat, the very embodiment of a certain flavor of American nostalgia.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Of course, Ronald Reagan didn’t cheerfully \u003ci\u003eannounce \u003c\/i\u003ein 1980 that if Americans elected him, private profit and market values would override all other American values; that as the economy grew nobody but the well-to-do would share in the additional bounty; that many millions of  middle-class jobs and careers would vanish, along with fixed private pensions and reliable healthcare; that a college degree would simultaneously become unaffordable and almost essential to earning a good income; that enforcement of antimonopoly laws would end; that meaningful control of political contributions by big business and the rich would be declared unconstitutional; that Washington lobbying would increase by 1,000 percent; that our revived and practically religious deference to business would enable a bizarre American denial of climate science and absolute refusal to treat the climate crisis as a crisis; that after doubling the share of the nation’s income that it took for itself, a deregulated Wall Street  would nearly bring down the financial system, ravage the economy, and pay no price for its recklessness; and that the federal government he’d committed to discrediting and undermining would thus be especially ill-equipped to deal with a pandemic and its consequences.New York Times bestseller; Author of Fantasyland","brand":"Random House Trade Paperbacks","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46300776038629,"sku":"NP9781984801357","price":20.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1842\/7735\/files\/9781984801357.jpg?v=1767726501","url":"https:\/\/k12savings.com\/products\/evil-geniuses-isbn-9781984801357","provider":"K12savings","version":"1.0","type":"link"}