{"product_id":"12-years-a-slave-movie-tiein-isbn-9780143125419","title":"12 Years a Slave (Movie Tie-In)","description":"\u003cb\u003eThe official movie tie-in edition to the winner of the 2014 Academy Award for Best Picture, starring Chiwetel Ejiofor, Michael Fassbender, and Lupita Nyong’o, and directed by Steve McQueen\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\u003ci\u003eNew York Times \u003c\/i\u003ebestseller\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“I could not believe that I had never heard of this book. It felt as important as Anne Frank’s \u003ci\u003eDiary, \u003c\/i\u003eonly published nearly a hundred years before. . . . The book blew [my] mind: the epic range, the details, the adventure, the horror, and the humanity. . . . I hope my film can play a part in drawing attention to this important book of courage. Solomon’s bravery and life deserve nothing less.” —\u003cb\u003eSteve McQueen, director of \u003ci\u003e12 Years a Slave, \u003c\/i\u003efrom the Foreword\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003ePerhaps the best written of all the slave narratives, \u003ci\u003eTwelve Years a Slave\u003c\/i\u003e is a harrowing memoir about one of the darkest periods in American history. It recounts how Solomon Northup, born a free man in New York, was lured to Washington, D.C., in 1841 with the promise of fast money, then drugged and beaten and sold into slavery. He spent the next twelve years of his life in captivity on a Louisiana cotton plantation.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eAfter his rescue, Northup published this exceptionally vivid and detailed account of slave life. It became an immediate bestseller and today is recognized for its unusual insight and eloquence as one of the very few portraits of American slavery produced by someone as educated as Solomon Northup, or by someone with the dual perspective of having been both a free man and a slave.“I could not believe that I had never heard of this book. It felt as important as Anne Frank’s \u003ci\u003eDiary,\u003c\/i\u003e only published nearly a hundred years before. . . . The book blew [my] mind: the epic range, the details, the adventure, the horror, and the humanity. . . . I hope my film can play a part in drawing attention to this important book of courage. Solomon’s bravery and life deserve nothing less.” —\u003cb\u003eSteve McQueen, director of \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cb\u003e12 Years a Slave, \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cb\u003efrom the Foreword\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“Frightening, gripping and inspiring . . . Northup’s story seems almost biblical, structured as it is as a descent and resurrection narrative of a protagonist who, like Christ, was 33 at the time of his abduction. . . . Northup reminds us of the fragile nature of freedom in any human society and the harsh reality that whatever legal boundaries existed between so-called free states and slave states in 1841, no black man, woman or child was permanently safe.” —\u003cb\u003eHenry Louis Gates, Jr., \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cb\u003efrom the Afterword\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e“For sheer drama, few accounts of slavery match Solomon Northup’s tale of abduction from freedom and forcible enslavement.”\u003cb\u003e —Ira Berlin, from the Introduction\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“If you think the movie offers a terrible-enough portrait of slavery, please, do read the book. . . . The film is stupendous art, but it owes much to a priceless piece of document. Solomon Northup’s memoir is history. . . . His was not simply an extraordinary story, but an account of the life of a great many ordinary people.”\u003cb\u003e —\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe Daily Beast\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“An incredible document, amazingly told and structured. Tough, but riveting. The movie of it by Steve McQueen might be the most successful adaptation of a book ever undertaken; text and film complement each other wildly.”\u003cb\u003e —Rachel Kushner, \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe New York Times Book Review\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“The best firsthand account of slavery.” —\u003cb\u003eJames M. McPherson, Pulitzer Prize–winning author of \u003ci\u003eBattle Cry of Freedom, \u003c\/i\u003ein \u003ci\u003eThe New York Times Book Review\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“Northup published a memoir of his 12-year nightmare in 1853, the year after \u003ci\u003eUncle Tom’s Cabin \u003c\/i\u003ecame out, and it was so successful that he went on to participate in two stage adaptations. The book dropped from sight in the 20th century, but the movie tie-in will certainly reestablish its virtually unique status as a work by an educated free man who managed to return from slavery.”\u003cb\u003e —\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe Hollywood Reporter\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cb\u003eSolomon Northup\u003c\/b\u003e (1808–c. 1863) was a free man kidnapped and forced into slavery in 1851. The details of his life after the publication of his acclaimed memoir are unknown.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eIra Berlin\u003c\/b\u003e is Distinguished Professor of History at the University of Maryland, College Park. His many books include \u003ci\u003eThe Making of African America\u003c\/i\u003e and \u003ci\u003eMany Thousands Gone\u003c\/i\u003e, winner of the Bancroft Prize and finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eHenry Louis Gates, Jr.,\u003c\/b\u003e is Alphonse Fletcher University Professor and director of the W. E. B Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University. He lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.\u003cp\u003ePENGUIN BOOKS\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTWELVE YEARS A SLAVE\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSOLOMON NORTHUP was a free man kidnapped into slavery in Washington, D.C., in 1841. Shortly after his escape, he published his memoirs to great acclaim and brought legal action against his abductors, though they were never prosecuted. The details of his life thereafter are unknown, but he is believed to have died in Glen Falls, New York, around 1863.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIRA BERLIN is Distinguished University Professor of History at the University of Maryland. He has written broadly on the history of the larger Atlantic world, especially on African and African American slavery and freedom. His many books include \u003ci\u003eThe Making of African America\u003c\/i\u003e, \u003ci\u003eSlaves Without Masters\u003c\/i\u003e, \u003ci\u003eGenerations of Captivity\u003c\/i\u003e, and \u003ci\u003eMany Thousands Gone: The First Two Centuries of Slavery in North America\u003c\/i\u003e, winner of the Bancroft Prize and the Frederick Douglass Book Prize and a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHENRY LOUIS GATES, JR. is Alphonse Fletcher University Professor and director of the W. E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University. He is editor in chief of the Oxford African American Studies Center and TheRoot.com, and host of \u003ci\u003eFaces of America\u003c\/i\u003e (PBS). He is general editor for a Penguin Classics series of African American works, including \u003ci\u003eThe Portable Charles W. Chesnutt\u003c\/i\u003e, edited with an introduction by William L. Andrews; \u003ci\u003eGod’s Trombones\u003c\/i\u003e by James Weldon Johnson, with a foreword by Maya Angelou; \u003ci\u003eIola Leroy\u003c\/i\u003e by Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, with an introduction by Hollis Robbins; and \u003ci\u003eThe Life of John Thompson, a Fugitive Slave\u003c\/i\u003e by John Thompson, edited with an introduction by William L. Andrews.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSOLOMON NORTHUP\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTwelve Years a Slave\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eIntroduction by\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIRA BERLIN\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eGeneral Editor\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHENRY LOUIS GATES, JR.\u003c\/p\u003e    \u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eForeword by\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSTEVE MCQUEEN\u003c\/p\u003e        \u003cp\u003ePENGUIN BOOKS\u003c\/p\u003e        \u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eForeword:\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA BOOK OF COURAGE\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThree and a half years before finishing the production of \u003ci\u003eTwelve Years a Slave\u003c\/i\u003e I was lost. I knew I wanted to tell a story about slavery, but where to start?\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFinally, I had the idea of a free man kidnapped into bondage, but that’s all I had. I was attracted to a story that had a main character any viewer could identify with, a free man who is captured and held against his will. For months I was trying to build a story around this beginning but not having great success until my partner Bianca Stigter, a historian, suggested that I take a look at true accounts of slavery. Within days of beginning our research Bianca had unearthed \u003ci\u003eTwelve Years a Slave\u003c\/i\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e“I think I got it,” she said. If ever there was an understatement. The book blew both our minds: the epic range, the details, the adventure, the horror, and the humanity. The book read like a film script, ready to be shot. I could not believe that I had never heard of this book. It felt as important as Anne Frank’s diary, only published nearly a hundred years before.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eI was not alone in being unfamiliar with the book. Of all the people I spoke to not one person knew about \u003ci\u003eTwelve Years a Slave\u003c\/i\u003e or about Solomon Northup. This was astonishing! An important tale told with so much heart and beauty needed to be more widely recognized.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eI hope my film can play a part in drawing attention to this important book of courage.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSolomon’s bravery and life deserve nothing less.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhat Is an\u003cbr\u003eAfrican American Classic?\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eI have long nurtured a deep and abiding affection for the Penguin Classics, at least since I was an undergraduate at Yale. I used to imagine that my attraction for these books—grouped together, as a set, in some independent bookstores when I was a student, and perhaps even in some today—stemmed from the fact that my first-grade classmates, for some reason that I can’t recall, were required to dress as penguins in our annual all-school pageant, and perform a collective side-to-side motion that our misguided teacher thought she could choreograph into something meant to pass for a “dance.” Piedmont, West Virginia, in 1956, was a very long way from Penguin Nation, wherever that was supposed to be! But penguins we were determined to be, and we did our level best to avoid wounding each other with our orange-colored cardboard beaks while stomping out of rhythm in our matching orange, veined webbed feet. The whole scene was madness, one never to be repeated at the Davis Free School. But I never stopped loving penguins. And I have never stopped loving the very audacity of the idea of the Penguin Classics, an affordable, accessible library of the most important and compelling texts in the history of civilization, their black-and-white spines and covers and uniform type giving each text a comfortable, familiar feel, as if we have encountered it, or its cousins, before. I think of the Penguin Classics as the very best and most compelling in human thought, an Alexandrian library in paperback, enclosed in black and white.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eI still gravitate to the Penguin Classics when killing time in an airport bookstore, deferring the slow torture of the security lines. Sometimes I even purchase two or three, fantasizing that I can speed-read one of the shorter titles, then make a dent in the longer one, vainly attempting to fill the holes in the liberal arts education that our degress suggest we have, over the course of a plane ride! Mark Twain once quipped that a classic is “something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read,” and perhaps that applies to my airport purchasing habits. For my generation, these titles in the Penguin Classics form the canon—the canon of the texts that a truly well-educated person should have read, and read carefully and closely, at least once. For years I rued the absence of texts by black authors in this series, and longed to be able to make even a small contribution to the diversification of this astonishingly universal list. I watched with great pleasure as titles by African American and African authors began to appear, some two dozen over the past several years. So when Elda Rotor approached me about editing a series of African American classics and collections for Penguin’s Portable Series, I eagerly accepted.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThinking about the titles appropriate for inclusion in these series led me, inevitably, to think about what, for me, constitutes a “classic.” And thinking about this led me, in turn, to the wealth of reflections on what defines a work of literature or philosophy somehow speaking to the human condition beyond time and place, a work somehow endlessly compelling, generation upon generation, a work whose author we don’t have to look like to identify with, to feel at one with, as we find ourselves transported through the magic of a textual time machine; a work that refracts the image of ourselves that we project onto it, regardless of our ethnicity, our gender, our time, our place. This is what centuries of scholars and writers have meant when they use the word “classic,” and—despite all that we know about the complex intersubjectivity of the production of meaning in the wondrous exchange between a reader and a text—it remains true that classic texts, even in the most conventional, conservative sense of the word “classic,” do exist, and these books will continue to be read long after the generation the text reflects and defines, the generation of readers contemporary with the text’s author, is dead and gone. Classic texts speak from their authors’ graves, in their names, in their voices. As Italo Calvino once remarked, “A classic is a book that has never finished saying what it has to say.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFaulkner put this idea in an interesting way: “The aim of every artist is to arrest motion, which is life, by artificial means, and hold it fixed so that a hundred years later, when a stranger looks at it, it moves again since it is life.” That, I am certain, must be the desire of every writer. But what about the reader? What makes a book a classic to a reader? Here, perhaps, Hemingway said it best: “All good books are alike in that they are truer than if they had really happened and after you are finished reading one you will feel that all that happened to you, and afterwards it belongs to you, the good and the bad, the ecstasy, the remorse and sorrow, the people and the places and how the weather was.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eI have been reading black literature since I was fifteen, yanked into the dark discursive universe by an Episcopal priest at a church camp near my home in West Virginia in August of 1965, during the terrifying days of the Watts Riots in Los Angeles. Eventually, by fits and starts, studying the literature written by black authors became my avocation; ultimately, it has become my vocation. And, in my own way, I have tried to be an evangelist for it, to a readership larger than my own people, people who, as it were, look like these texts. Here, I am reminded of something W. S. Merwin said about the books he most loved: “Perhaps a classic is a work that one imagines should be common knowledge, but more and more often isn’t.” I would say, of African and African American literature, that perhaps classic works by black writers are works that one imagines should be common knowledge among the broadest possible readership but that less and less are, as the teaching of reading to understand how words can create the worlds into which books can transport us yields to classroom instruction geared toward passing a state-authorized, standardized exam. All literary texts suffer from this wrongheaded approach to teaching, mind you; but it especially affects texts by people of color, and texts by women—texts still struggling, despite enormous gains over the last twenty years, to gain a solid foothold in anthologies and syllabi. For every anthology, every syllabus, every publishing series such as the Penguin Classics constitutes a distinct “canon,” an implicit definition of all that is essential for a truly educated person to read.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eJames Baldwin, who has pride of place in my personal canon of African American authors since it was one of his books that that Episcopal priest gave me to read in that dreadful summer of 1965, argued that “the responsibility of a writer is to excavate the experience of the people who produced him.” But surely Baldwin would have agreed with E. M. Forster that the books that we remember, the books that have truly influenced us, are those that “have gone a little further down our particular path than we have yet ourselves.” Excavating the known is a worthy goal of the writer as cultural archaeologist; yet, at the same time, so is unveiling the unknown, the unarticulated yet shared experience of the colorless things that make us human: “something we have always known (or thought we knew),” as Calvino puts it, “but without knowing that this author said it first.” We might think of the difference between Forster and Baldwin, on the one hand, and Calvino, on the other, as the difference between an author representing what has happened (Forster, Baldwin) in the history of a people whose stories, whose very history itself, has long been suppressed, and what could have happened (Calvino) in the atemporal realm of art. This is an important distinction when thinking about the nature of an African American classic—rather, when thinking about the nature of the texts that comprise the African American literary tradition or, for that matter, the texts in any underread tradition.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne of James Baldwin’s most memorable essays, a subtle meditation on sexual preference, race, and gender, is entitled “Here Be Dragons.” So much of traditional African American literature, even fiction and poetry—ostensibly at least once removed from direct statement—was meant to deal a fatal blow to the dragon of racism. For black writers since the eighteenth-century beginnings of the tradition, literature has been one more weapon—a very important weapon, mind you, but still one weapon among many—in the arsenal black people have drawn upon to fight against antiblack racism and for their equal rights before the law. Ted Joans, the black surrealist poet, called this sort of literature from the sixties’ Black Arts movement “hand grenade poems.” Of what possible use are the niceties of figuration when one must slay a dragon? I can hear you say give me the blunt weapon anytime! Problem is, it is more difficult than some writers seem to think to slay a dragon with a poem or a novel. Social problems persist; literature too tied to addressing those social problems tends to enter the historical archives, leaving the realm of the literary. Let me state bluntly what should be obvious: writers are read for how they write, not what they write about.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrederick Douglass—for this generation of readers one of the most widely read writers—reflected on this matter even in the midst of one of his most fiery speeches addressing the ironies of the sons and daughters of slaves celebrating the Fourth of July while slavery continued unabated. In his now-classic essay “What Is to the Slave the Fourth of July” (1852), Douglass argued that an immediate, almost transparent form of discourse was demanded of black writers by the heated temper of the times, a discourse with an immediate end in mind: “At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed….a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake.” Above all else, Douglass concludes, the rhetoric of the literature created by African Americans must, of necessity, be a purposeful rhetoric, its ends targeted at attacking the evils that afflict black people: “The feeling of the nation must be quickened; the conscience of the nation must be roused; the propriety of the nation must be startled; the hypocrisy of the nation must be exposed; and its crimes against God and man must be proclaimed and denounced.” And perhaps this was so; nevertheless, we read Douglass’s writings today in literature classes not so much for their content but to understand, and marvel at, his sublime mastery of words, words—to paraphrase Calvino—that never finish saying what it is they have to say, not because of their “message,” but because of the language in which that message is inextricably enfolded.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThere are as many ways to define a classic in the African American tradition as there are in any other tradition, and these ways are legion. So many essays have been published entitled “What Is a Classic?” that they could fill several large anthologies. And while no one can say explicitly why generations of readers return to read certain texts, just about everyone can agree that making a best-seller list in one’s lifetime is most certainly not an index of fame or influence over time; the longevity of one’s readership—of books about which one says, “I am rereading,” as Calvino puts it—on the other hand, most certainly is. So, the size of one’s readership (through library use, Internet access, and sales) cumulatively is an interesting factor to consider; and because of series such as the Penguin Classics, we can gain a sense, for our purposes, of those texts written by authors in previous generations that have sustained sales—mostly for classroom use—long after their authors were dead.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThere can be little doubt that \u003ci\u003eNarrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass\u003c\/i\u003e (1845), \u003ci\u003eThe Souls of Black Folk\u003c\/i\u003e (1903), by W. E. B. Du Bois, and \u003ci\u003eTheir Eyes Were Watching God\u003c\/i\u003e (1937), by Zora Neale Hurston, are the three most classic of the black classics—again, as measured by consumption—while Langston Hughes’s poetry, though not purchased as books in these large numbers, is accessed through the Internet as frequently as that of any other American poet, and indeed profoundly more so than most. Within Penguin’s Portable Series list, the most popular individual titles, excluding Douglass’s first slave narrative and Du Bois’s \u003ci\u003eSouls,\u003c\/i\u003e are:\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eUp from Slavery\u003c\/i\u003e (1903), Booker T. Washington\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eThe Autobiography of an Ex-Coloured Man\u003c\/i\u003e (1912), James Weldon Johnson\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eGod’s Trombones\u003c\/i\u003e (1926), James Weldon Johnson\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003ePassing\u003c\/i\u003e (1929), Nella Larsen\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eThe Marrow of Tradition\u003c\/i\u003e (1898), Charles W. Chesnutt\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eIncidents in the Life of a Slave Girl\u003c\/i\u003e (1861), Harriet Jacobs\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eThe Interesting Narrative\u003c\/i\u003e (1789), Olaudah Equiano\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eThe House Behind the Cedars\u003c\/i\u003e (1900), Charles W. Chesnutt\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eMy Bondage and My Freedom\u003c\/i\u003e (1855), Frederick Douglass\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eQuicksand\u003c\/i\u003e (1928), Nella Larsen\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese titles form a canon of classics of African American literature, judged by classroom readership. If we add Jean Toomer’s novel \u003ci\u003eCane\u003c\/i\u003e (1922), arguably the first work of African American modernism, along with Douglass’s first narrative, Du Bois’s \u003ci\u003eThe Souls,\u003c\/i\u003e and Hurston’s \u003ci\u003eTheir Eyes,\u003c\/i\u003e we would most certainly have included many of the touchstones of black literature published before 1940, when Richard Wright published \u003ci\u003eNative Son\u003c\/i\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEvery teacher’s syllabus constitutes a canon of sorts, and I teach these texts and a few others as the classics of the black canon. Why these particular texts? I can think of two reasons: First, these texts signify or riff upon each other, repeating, borrowing, and extending metaphors book to book, generation to generation. To take just a few examples, Equiano’s eighteenth-century use of the trope of the talking book (an image found, remarkably, in five slave narratives published between 1770 and 1811) becomes, with Frederick Douglass, the representation of the quest for freedom as, necessarily, the quest for literacy, for a freedom larger than physical manumission; we might think of this as the representation of metaphysical manumission, of freedom and literacy—the literacy of great literature—inextricably intertwined. Douglass transformed the metaphor of the talking book into the trope of chiasmus, a repetition with a stinging reversal: “You have seen how a man becomes a slave, you will see how a slave becomes a man.” Du Bois, with Douglass very much on his mind, transmuted chiasmus a half century later into the metaphor of duality or double consciousness, a necessary condition of living one’s life, as he memorably put it, behind a “veil.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDu Bois’s metaphor has a powerful legacy in twentieth-century black fiction: James Weldon Johnson, in \u003ci\u003eEx-Coloured Man,\u003c\/i\u003e literalizes the trope of double consciousness by depicting as his protagonist a man who, at will, can occupy two distinct racial spaces, one black, one white, and who moves seamlessly, if ruefully, between them; Toomer’s \u003ci\u003eCane\u003c\/i\u003e takes Du Bois’s metaphor of duality for the inevitably split consciousness that every Negro must feel living in a country in which her or his status as a citizen is liminal at best, or has been erased at worst, and makes of this the metaphor for the human condition itself under modernity, a tellingly bold rhetorical gesture—one designed to make the Negro the metaphor of the human condition. And Hurston, in \u003ci\u003eTheir Eyes,\u003c\/i\u003e extends Toomer’s revision even further, depicting a character who can only gain her voice once she can name this condition of duality or double consciousness and then glide gracefully and lyrically between her two selves, an “inside” self and an “outside” one.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMore recently, Alice Walker, in \u003ci\u003eThe Color Purple,\u003c\/i\u003e signifies upon two aspects of the narrative strategy of \u003ci\u003eTheir Eyes\u003c\/i\u003e: first, she revisits the theme of a young black woman finding her voice, depicting a protagonist who writes herself into being through letters addressed to God and to her sister, Nettie—letters that grow ever more sophisticated in their syntax and grammar and imagery as she comes to consciousness before our very eyes, letter to letter; and second, Walker riffs on Hurston’s use of a vernacular-inflected free indirect discourse to show that black English has the capacity to serve as the medium for narrating a novel through the black dialect that forms a most pliable and expansive language in Celie’s letters. Ralph Ellison makes Du Bois’s metaphor of the veil a trope of blindness and life underground for his protagonist in \u003ci\u003eInvisible Man,\u003c\/i\u003e a protagonist who, as he types the story of his life from a hole underground, writes himself into being in the first person (in contradistinction to Richard Wright’s protagonist, Bigger Thomas, whose reactive tale of fear and flight is told in the third person). Walker’s novel also riffs on Ellison’s claim for the revolutionary possibilities of writing the self into being, whereas Hurston’s protagonist, Janie, speaks herself into being. Ellison himself signified multiply upon Richard Wright’s \u003ci\u003eNative Son,\u003c\/i\u003e from the title to the use of the first-person bildungsroman to chart the coming to consciousness of a sensitive protagonist moving from blindness and an inability to do little more than react to his environment, to the insight gained by wresting control of his identity from social forces and strong individuals that would circumscribe and confine his life choices. Toni Morrison, master supernaturalist and perhaps the greatest black novelist of all, trumps Ellison’s trope of blindness by returning over and over to the possibilities and limits of insight within worlds confined or circumscribed not by supraforces (à la Wright) but by the confines of the imagination and the ironies of individual and family history, signifying upon Faulkner, Woolf, and Márquez in the process. And Ishmael Reed, the father of black postmodernism and what we might think of as the hip-hop novel, the tradition’s master paro-dist, signifies upon everybody and everything in the black literary tradition, from the slave narratives to the Harlem Renaissance to black nationalism and feminism.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis sort of literary signifying is what makes a literary tradition, well, a “tradition,” rather than a simple list of books whose authors happen to have been born in the same country, share the same gender, or would be identified by their peers as belonging to this ethnic group or that. What makes these books special—“classic”—however, is something else. Each text has the uncanny capacity to take the seemingly mundane details of the day-to-day African American experience of its time and transmute those details and the characters’ actions into something that transcends its ostensible subject’s time and place, its specificity. These texts reveal the human universal through the African American particular: all true art, all classics, do this; this is what “art” is, a revelation of that which makes each of us sublimely human, rendered in the minute details of the actions and thoughts and feelings of a compelling character embedded in a time and place. But as soon as we find ourselves turning to a text for its anthropological or socio-logical data, we have left the realm of art; we have reduced the complexity of fiction or poetry to an essay, and this is not what imaginative literature is for. Richard Wright, at his best, did this, as did his signifying disciple Ralph Ellison; Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington, Bessie Smith and Billie Holiday achieved this effect in music; Jacob Lawrence and Romare Bearden achieved it in the visual arts. And this is what Wole Soyinka does in his tragedies, what Toni Morrison does in her novels, what Derek Walcott does in his poetry. And while it is risky to name one’s contemporaries in a list such as this, I think that Rita Dove and Jamaica Kincaid achieve this effect as well, as do Colson Whitehead and Edwidge Danticat, in a younger generation. (There are other writers whom I would include in this group had I the space.) By delving ever so deeply into the particularity of the African and African American experience, these authors manage, somehow, to come out the other side, making the race or the gender of their characters almost translucent, less important than the fact that they stand as aspects of ourselves beyond race or gender or time or place, precisely in the same magical way that Hamlet never remains for long stuck as a prince in a court in Denmark.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEach classic black text reveals to us, uncannily, subtly, how the Black Experience is inscribed, inextricably and indelibly, in the human experience, and how the human experience takes one of its myriad forms in blackface, as it were. Together, such texts also demonstrate, implicitly, that African American culture is one of the world’s truly great and eternal cultures, as noble and as resplendent as any. And it is to publish such texts, written by African and African American authors, that Penguin has created this new series, which I have the pleasure of editing.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHENRY LOUIS GATES, JR.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntroduction\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSOLOMON NORTHUP:\u003cbr\u003eA LIFE AND A MESSAGE\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor sheer drama, few accounts of slavery match Solomon Northup’s tale of abduction from freedom and forcible enslavement.1 Lured to Washington in 1841 from his home in upstate New York with the promise of easy employment, fast money, and great adventure, Northup was drugged and beaten and sold into slavery within sight of the nation’s capitol. He then joined the mass of black humanity—some one million in number—that was forcibly transported south to reconstruct the plantation economy on new ground, as the center of American slavery shifted from the production of tobacco and rice in the seaboard states to that of cotton and sugar in the interior. In Louisiana, Northup labored as a slave for twelve years until, in 1853, a dramatic rescue returned him to freedom and his family in the North.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrederick Douglass, no stranger to the brutal realities of slavery, confirmed the power of Northup’s narrative. “Think of it,” Douglass wrote. “For thirty years a man with all a man’s hopes, fears, and aspirations—with a wife and children to call him by endearing names of husband and father—with a home, humble it may be, but still a home…then for twelve years a thing, a chattel personal, classed with mules and horses….It chills the blood.”2\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlood is everywhere in \u003ci\u003eTwelve Years a Slave\u003c\/i\u003e. Northup makes clear that the slave owner’s authority could be maintained only by terrorizing black people with relentless physical and psychological violence. Whips, paddles, shackles, and stocks make repeat appearances, especially during the process of reducing the newly kidnapped free man to a slave. Stripped of his clothing, nailed to the floor, Northup endures\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Penguin Books","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46302022205669,"sku":"NP9780143125419","price":18.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1842\/7735\/files\/9780143125419.jpg?v=1767720171","url":"https:\/\/k12savings.com\/products\/12-years-a-slave-movie-tiein-isbn-9780143125419","provider":"K12savings","version":"1.0","type":"link"}