{"product_id":"transience-and-permanence-in-urban-development-isbn-9781119055655","title":"Transience and Permanence in Urban Development","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTemporary urban uses \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003e–\u003c\/b\u003e \u003cb\u003einnovative ways to transform cities or new means to old ends?\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe scale and variety of temporary – or meanwhile or interim – urban uses and spaces has grown rapidly in response to the dramatic increase in vacant and derelict land and buildings, particularly in post-industrial cities. To some, this indicates that a paradigm shift in city making is underway. To others, alternative urbanism is little more than a distraction that temporarily cloaks some of the negative outcomes of conventional urban development. However, rigorous, theoretically informed criticism of temporary uses has been limited. The book draws on international experience to address this shortcoming from the perspectives of the law, sociology, human geography, urban studies, planning and real estate.\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt considers how time – and the way that it is experienced – informs alternative perspectives on transience. It emphasises the importance, for analysis, of the structural position of a temporary use in an urban system in spatial, temporal and socio-cultural terms. It illustrates how this position is contingent upon circumstances. What may be deemed a helpful and acceptable use to established institutions in one context may be seen as a problematic, unacceptable use in another. What may be a challenging and fulfilling alternative use to its proponents may lose its allure if it becomes successful in conventional terms. Conceptualisations of temporary uses are, therefore, mutable and the use of fixed or insufficiently differentiated frames of reference within which to study them should be avoided. It then identifies the major challenges of transforming a temporary use into a long-term use. These include the demands of regulatory compliance, financial requirements, levels of expertise and so on. Finally, the potential impacts of policy on temporary uses, both inadvertent and intended, are considered. \u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe first substantive, critical review of temporary urban uses, \u003ci\u003eTransience and Permanence in Urban Development \u003c\/i\u003eis essential reading for academics, policy makers, practitioners and students of cities worldwide. \u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eList of Contributors xiii\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes on Contributors xv\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreface xxi\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements xxv\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e1 Introduction: Temporary Uses as Alternative Practices 1\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eJohn Henneberry\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eVacant land and temporary use 1\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheorising and conceptualising temporary use 3\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescribing and analysing temporary uses 6\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCritical analysis of temporary use 9\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe coverage of the book 11\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgement 13\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 14\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2 Forcing the Empties Back to Work? Ruinphobia and the Bluntness of Law and Policy 17\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eLuke Bennett\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction: gazing upon the New Ruins 17\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow ruinphobia unsettles us 18\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTracing ruinphobia into urban law and policy 20\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTime is always running out for a building and its uses 26\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs ruinphobia forcing empties back to work, or are law’s tools blunt? 27\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 28\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3 Liminal Spaces and Theorising the Permanence of Transience 31\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eNicola Livingstone and Peter Matthews\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 31\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheorising transient spatialities 33\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFood banks as spaces of the in-between 36\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTemporalities and ‘yet-ness’ in Wester Hailes 39\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusion 42\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 43\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4 Temporary Uses Producing Difference in Contemporary Urbanism 47\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003ePanu Lehtovuori and Sampo Ruoppila\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 47\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe difference that temporary uses may produce 48\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTemporary uses, appropriation and the Right to the City 49\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTowards a socio-spatial theory of temporary uses – margins, fallows, amenities, commons 51\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDifference driven by users 54\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTemporary uses, regeneration and gentrification 57\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusion: non-commodified spaces in a commodifying city 60\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 62\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e5 Short-Term Projects, Long-Term Ambitions: Facets of Transience in Two London Development Sites 65\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eKrystallia Kamvasinou\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 65\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHistorical framework 66\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase study 1: Canning Town Caravanserai: semi-public community and events space with emphasis on up-cycling 68\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase study 2: Cultivate London Brentford Lock: urban farm and social enterprise project 73\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalytical framework: key themes 78\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConcluding thoughts 80\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements 82\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 82\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e6 Navigating the Rapids of Urban Development: Lessons from the Biospheric Foundation, Salford, UK 85\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eBeth Perry, Vincent Walsh and Catherine Barlow\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 85\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom vision to practice 86\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Janus faces of urban socio-ecological experimentation 95\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements 98\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 98\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e7 The Urban Voids of Istanbul 101\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eBasak Tanulku\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIstanbul: global city of Turkey with no ‘vacancy’ 102\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDifferent types of urban voids in Istanbul 103\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThree case studies 105\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhysical void: from ghostly historic homes to high-value offices 105\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhysical void: squatting as an alternative space 108\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSymbolic void: the Ataturk Cultural Centre 111\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusion 114\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgments 115\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 115\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e8 Institutionalizing Urban Possibility: Urban Greening and Vacant Land Governance in Three American Cities 117\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eKatherine Foo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eState strategies in urban shrinkage 117\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental coalitions in urban shrinkage 118\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethods 119\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCivic environmental coalitions in weak land markets 120\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWindows of opportunity: political coalitions in Boston, Philadelphia, and Baltimore 122\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolitical will and investment capacity: a counter-cyclical relationship 128\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 129\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9 The Trajectory of Berlin’s ‘Interim Spaces’: Tensions and Conflicts in the Mobilisation of ‘Temporary Uses’ of Urban Space in Local Economic Development 131\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eClaire Colomb\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e‘Temporary uses’ and ‘interim spaces’ in reunified Berlin 132\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mobilisation of ‘temporary uses’ in local economic development and place marketing policies 134\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe dilemmas and tensions inherent in the mobilisation of temporary uses as a tool of urban revitalisation: trajectories, conflicts and resistance 136\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe contested future of the Tempelhof airfield 141\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusion 146\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 147\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e10 Pop-up Justice? Reflecting on Relationships in the Temporary City 151\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eAmelia Thorpe, Timothy Moore and Lee Stickells\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTactics and interventions 151\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eJustice in the city 154\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAttending to the particular 157\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAttending to the collective 161\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusion 165\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements 166\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 166\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e11 Planning, Property Rights, and the Tragedy of the Anticommons: Temporary Uses in Portland and Detroit 171\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eMatthew F Gebhardt\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 171\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Tragedy of the Anticommons 172\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnticommons and real estate development 173\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnticommons, informality, and temporary use 175\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase studies 177\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusion 182\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 183\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e12 Valuation and the Evolution of New Uses and Buildings 185\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eNeil Crosby and John Henneberry\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 185\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe acceptance of the new 186\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe comparative approach to property valuation 189\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe institutional context of the application of comparison techniques 193\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe calculative regime of comparative valuation 195\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 196\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e13 Public Policy and Urban Transience: Provoking New Urban Development through Contemporary Models of Property Based Finance in England 199\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eKevin Muldoon-Smith and Paul Greenhalgh\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction: public policy and urban transience 199\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConceptual framework 200\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFiscal decentralisation and the urban built environment 202\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinancing urban transience 206\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscussion and conclusion 210\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 212\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e14 Tackling Hardcore Vacancy through Compulsory Sale Orders 215\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eDavid Adams\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction 215\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHardcore vacancy 216\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn institutional explanation of hardcore vacancy 220\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCompulsory Sale Orders 224\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBalancing property rights and responsibilities 226\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusions 228\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 229\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e15 Frameworks for Temporary Use: Experiments of Urban Regeneration in Bremen, Rome and Budapest 231\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eDaniela Patti and Levente Polyak\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe conditions of temporary use 232\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransferring models 233\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMunicipality-initiated temporary use: ZwischenZeitZentrale, Bremen 235\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFormalising activism: temporary use experiments in Rome 238\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEstablishing trust: public and private initiatives for temporary use in Budapest 242\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusions 246\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 248\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e16 Conclusions: The Tensions and Dilemmas of Transience 249\u003cbr\u003e \u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eJohn Henneberry\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTime, transience and temporality 250\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe structural position of transience in the urban system 252\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe transition from temporary to established use 256\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy and transience 260\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConclusions 263\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements 264\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 264\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndex 265\u003c\/p\u003e   \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAbout the Editor\u003c\/b\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eJohn Henneberry\u003c\/b\u003e is Professor of Property Development Studies at The University of Sheffield, UK, and a Chartered Planner and Chartered Surveyor. He has researched and published on property development and investment and their roles in urban and regional development for over 30 years. He is a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, UK.     \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTransience and Permanence in Urban Development\u003c\/b\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTemporary urban uses – innovative ways to transform cities or new means to old ends?\u003c\/b\u003e  \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe scale and variety of temporary – or meanwhile or interim – urban uses and spaces have grown rapidly in response to the dramatic increase in vacant and derelict land and buildings, particularly in post-industrial cities. To some, this indicates that a paradigm shift in city making is underway. To others, alternative urbanism is little more than a distraction that temporarily cloaks some of the negative outcomes of conventional urban development. However, rigorous, theoretically informed criticism of temporary uses has been limited. The book draws on international experience to address this shortcoming from the perspectives of the law, sociology, human geography, urban studies, planning and real estate.  \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIt considers how time – and the way that it is experienced – informs alternative perspectives on transience. It emphasises  the importance, for analysis, of the structural position of a temporary use in an urban system in spatial, temporal and socio-cultural terms. It illustrates how this position is contingent upon circumstances. What may be deemed a helpful and acceptable use to established institutions in one context may be seen as a problematic, unacceptable use in another. What may be a challenging and fulfilling alternative use to its proponents may lose its allure if it becomes successful in conventional terms. Conceptualisations of temporary uses are, therefore, mutable and the use of fixed or insufficiently differentiated frames of reference within which to study them should be avoided. It then identifies the major challenges of transforming a temporary use into a long-term use. These include the demands of regulatory compliance, financial requirements, levels of expertise and so on. Finally, the potential impacts of policy on temporary uses, both inadvertent and intended, are considered.  \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe first substantive, critical review of temporary urban uses, \u003ci\u003eTransience and Permanence in Urban Development\u003c\/i\u003e is essential reading for academics, policy makers, practitioners and students of cities worldwide.  \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAlso available in the series\u003c\/b\u003e  \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eUrban Design in the Real Estate Development Process\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Tiesdell and Adams  \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eUrban Regeneration and Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Colantonio and Dixon  \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eBuilding Cycles: Growth and Instability\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Barras \u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Wiley-Blackwell","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47990407332069,"sku":"NP9781119055655","price":162.95,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1842\/7735\/files\/9781119055655.jpg?v=1761787705","url":"https:\/\/k12savings.com\/es\/products\/transience-and-permanence-in-urban-development-isbn-9781119055655","provider":"K12savings","version":"1.0","type":"link"}